March 31, 2011 § 4 Comments
Gabriel Rossman’s post about the ASA job bank is an important one. Particularly important is the question of why the job bank should be treated as a profit center for the ASA. There is a hint of hypocrisy in the whole enterprise, for while the job bank is treated as a profit center, the proposed dues increase is rationalized by the statement that “ASA provides professional public goods … [It] provides timely information on the job market for sociologists and brings potential employers and employees together.” One of these things is not like the other.
The case of the job bank is striking, because in the modern day and age, it is trivially easy to perform the same function. Herewith a challenge to young, enterprising sociologists: set up a competing on-line job bank. Heck, colonize a portion of Craigslist. The main challenge is getting employers to send you their listings. (Job-seekers will find you.) But since you can offer a much lower price — if you get volunteer labor, the price could be zero — it is hard to see why they would resist. There is no way this costs anywhere close to $200/month per ad.
March 31, 2011 § 3 Comments
There is a bit of a discussion in the comments in response to Don Tomaskovic-Davey’s dicussion of ASA finances here and on scatterplot. Don’s response is worth taking seriously since – as former Secretary of the ASA – his is the closest we have yet gotten to an official response to some of our concerns. So The Disgruntled Sociologist is surfacing it from the depths of the comments.
March 30, 2011 § 19 Comments
In response to the last post relating the ASA Executive Director’s response to member inquiries, TDS received the following comment. With permission of its author, it is reproduced in full here. Worth reading in full.
It appears you may have been influenced by some highly inaccurate recent blog postings on the web. The elected leadership of the association is preparing accurate information so that members will not be mislead by some bloggers who have misread the ASA tax forms [snip – cc]. NONE of these are true.).
So it would appear that membership dues are supporting a Ministry of Truth? Sigh…
March 30, 2011 § 5 Comments
March 29, 2011 § Leave a comment
An acquaintance of The Disgruntled Sociologist, who has taken the step of resigning his or her membership, reports that this has resulted in a series of emails touting the virtues of the ASA. He/she sends along the following, most recent example:
I am writing to encourage you to renew your ASA membership. I write not only as the ASA Executive Officer and a fellow sociologist, but also as a long-term member myself, having « Read the rest of this entry »
March 29, 2011 § 2 Comments
March 24, 2011 § 7 Comments
As noted by others, the ASA has just announced a hefty dues increase. The Disgruntled Sociologist finds this crazy making, as do others. Kieran and Jeremy have good analyses of how outrageous this is.
It’s very puzzling that dues are jumping so suddenly. Over many years, the increases have kept pace with inflation. Now suddenly, there is a need for a big increase. Why?
One answer is that it is expensive to maintain a nice condo close to the White House. Another is that it is expensive to increase the size of the headquarters staff. And a third – the subject of this post – is that while sociologists have been keeping pace with inflation, the leaders of the ASA have been doing quite a bit better. In short, let’s turn The Disgruntled Sociologist’s eye to executive compensation.
The members of the American Sociological Association delegate a lot of the responsibilities for day-to-day operations, as well as strategic initiatives, to the association’s Executive Director. As in all such situations, this delegation creates potential monitoring problems: the members are numerous and busy with other things, and do not have the time, energy or information to effectively keep tabs on whether the Executive Director is doing a good job. As the recent coverage of executive compensation in major corporations suggests, this can make it difficult to ensure that compensation is in line with performance.
Does the ASA have an executive compensation problem?
The current Executive Director of the American Sociological Association, Sally Hillsman, was hired on May 15, 2002, so we look at the ED’s compensation from 2003-2008. Over that period, the ED has been paid substantially better than the average sociologist, and has seen substantially higher income growth.
- In 2008, the Executive Director earned almost 3 times the salary of the average faculty member, and 2.25x the salary of the average Full Professor.
- In 2008, the salary of the Executive Director of the ASA was $206,364, plus benefits.
- In the same year, according to the ASA, the average salary of a sociology faculty member was $70,699. The average Full Professor earned $89,808.
- In the period from 2003 to 2008, the salary of the Executive Director of the ASA has increased substantially while sociologists’ salaries have remained essentially flat.
- The ED’s salary increased from $165,000 to $206,304. This is an increase of 25%. In inflation-adjusted terms, this is an increase in real income of 6.8%.
- Over the same period, the average sociology faculty member has barely outpaced inflation, increasing 1.3% in real terms over the same period.
Boy, the ASA must have been doing some great stuff under the current leadership! Although apparently, increasing the average income of sociology professors was not one of those things.
The Disgruntled Sociologist thinks these facts raise some pretty interesting questions:
- How many members of the ASA are aware of these numbers? How many would be surprised to learn that their dues go, in part, toward putting the Executive Director in the top 2-3% of the income distribution?
- Is this money well spent? Are the salary increases justified? One might be skeptical.
The Disgruntled Sociologist does not begrudge Sally Hillsman her income; more power to her. The members of the ASA, however, might ask whether they want or need to pay their Executive Director so well. Or whether the Executive Director needs essentially automatic 5% raises every year (nominal). The Disgruntled Sociologist wants to emphasize where all of this money is coming from:
- If you are an ASA member, it is coming from your dues. Many members feel dues are too high. If you are lucky, you can pay these dues out of your research account – but you worked hard for that privilege. If not, money is going out of your pocket. A lot of ASA members pay the dues out of their pockets. Those dues just went up.
- Even if you’re a sociologist who is not a member of the ASA, you are helping to put the ED’s income north of $200K. How? To put it simply: the ASA journals are cash cows that provide a steady stream of income to the ASA. And of course, the journals are cash cows because you (and generations of sociologists before you): a) are willing to pay to have them think about publishing your papers, which you provide at no cost to them; b) gladly sign over the copyright to your work; and c) provide the labor, free of charge and without recognition, to help them decide which papers should be published.
To put it bluntly, the Executive Director makes a living thanks to the blood, sweat and tears of sociologists who earn 1/3 as much. Some sociologists might consider that evidence of exploitation.